http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/27/911-cover-up/
...The DIA has long tried to squelch this discussion. On Sept. 21, 2005, Attorney Mark Zaid - representing Mr. Shaffer and others who worked on Able Danger but were ordered not to discuss it - testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on this and other matters. He said, "It is Lt. Col. Shaffer's specific recollection that he informed those in attendance, which included several Defense Department personnel, that Able Danger had identified two of the three successful 9/11 cells to include Atta. That statement is disputed by the 9/11 Commission and may never be resolved." This matter was not mentioned in the final 9/11 report.
If the government had specific information on the al Qaeda terror cells planning the Sept. 11 attacks dating back to 2000, it would be a severe embarrassment to Clinton administration officials who were in office at the time. Former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger pled guilty in 2005 to removing and destroying classified material from the National Archives that may have had a bearing on the issue. Now the government is attempting to keep Mr. Shaffer muzzled on what he knew. If nothing else, this strange episode will reenergize the critical questions regarding the official story about what the Clinton administration knew before the Sept. 11 attacks, and why they failed to take effective action.
Шота вааще уже ничего нормально скрыть не могут.
Если конспираси теори Буша и Ко развалицо, то будет ппц.
Бааальшой ППЦ.
Миллионы американцев перживут ( а может и не переживут) глубой эмоциональный шок от такого грубого обмана со строны "демократически выбранного" правительства.
Предлагаю завалить СМИ разного рода бредовыми конспираси теори , что бы Бушевская 9/11 теори выглядела не так глупо.
Как говорится будем побеждать врага его же оружеем.
Нам в Англии кстати тоже нужно что-то подобное.
А то уже Блэера хотят судить как военного преступника за обман про ОМП в Ираке и последующую войну.
