Начал новую тему, так как все старые касаются полностью устаревшей ветки 1.х

Итак, что говорят независимые обозреватели про Early Acces? ( весной планируется Beta, финальный релиз - осенью )

Dean IversonWorking with the recent early access release of JavaFX 2.0 has been interesting. On one hand, the scene graph API you know and love translates surprisingly well to Java. The team at Oracle has done a nice job of keeping the new API simple to use. The animation support still makes it easy to do the simple things, and possible to do the sophisticated. The memory overhead is down while performance is up. All good.

You can always add some of that sweetness back in by using one of the many great JVM languages at our disposal. My weapon of choice happens to be Groovy and I can tell you that Groovy and JavaFX are a potent combination. Apparently Groovy is a terrific language for expressing application frameworks as it boasts two of the best in the Java world: Grails for web applications and Griffon for desktop applications.

Yesterday I decided to take a quick look at what would be involved in creating a JavaFX application plugin for Griffon. I was pleasantly surprised at how easy it was.

Adam BieanThe installation of Java FX 2.0 is as simple as it can get - unzip of the Early Access was sufficient.

First observations:
Startup of the provided examples is extremely fast < 1 sec and orders of magnitude faster than previous Java FX 1.3 samples
A double click on a Jar-file is sufficient to launch a Java FX app - no further configuration was necessary
The doc comes in fresh design and is compelling
Java FX 2.0 is extremely easy to integrate with Java projects - the inclusion of a single Jar is sufficient
The runtime is far smaller, than expected
The first impression of the Java FX 2.0 Early Access is far better, than expected so far...

Eric BrunoI'm consulting for a company that's on the list to receive early access releases of JavaFX 2.0. In fact, we took delivery of the first software drop last week. My first impression? Impressive! Both my client and I are very excited by it. Since June, we've been building custom JavaFX 1.3.1 components and integrating them into an existing enterprise Swing application. Although I had to work some magic of my own to get JavaFX working with Swing, JavaFX 2.0 promises to officially support Swing integration.

As we continue to work with JavaFX 2.0, I plan to blog about the experience here. Follow my blog throughout the process to get exclusive insight into Oracle's next generation Java client API. For now, you can find the JavaFX 2.0


Если кратко - большая часть работы сделана, концепции Scene, Node, binding, etc. элегантно переведены на Java API. Существующие jvm языки также могут воспользоваться JavaFX - это отлично!

Также рекомендую прослушать интервью с Richard Bair ( главный по JavaFX )
http://kenai.com/downloads/javaspotlight/JavaSpotlight016.mp3

Adam Bien выложил код простого приложения на JavaFX2.0 (Early Access)

http://www.adam-bien.com/roller/abien/

Must see!!!

Кто бы сомневался?

Когда ты станешь хотя бы вполовину таким известным как Адам, сразу сможешь объяснить всем, что JavaFX sucks:)

ПС.


Ты реально думаешь, что твой пример - верх совершенства?

ПС.


Ты реально думаешь, что твой пример - верх совершенства?

Таким клиентам вообще не требуется JavaFX/Silverlight/Flash

Банального javascript'a за глаза.

@пролетевший


На маках точно идет.

1024


О, это же та самая мегаигрушка!!!

Ноут-то получил? Или злые сановские манагеры обобрали?:)

2пролетевший

Если не под NDA - как со временем запуска, сколько памяти ест простое приложение, сколько классов подгружает?